The underestimated value of political correctness
January 31, 2015Journalists have always faced difficult ethical questions about what to publish and how, and in light of the attack on Charlie Hebdo as a result of their editorial decisions, these conversations about presentation seem pressing. In the densely entangled layers of questions that involve religious tolerance, the freedom of the press and western hegemony, the role of offense consistently appears as a core dispute. Whether or not you are going to offend someone is an answered question – you probably will, but whether or not that offense should be enough to stop you from publishing or speaking requires more consideration. Writers should ask themselves first: what is accomplished through offense and second, is there another way to achieve the same end while minimizing the offense to others. This second route is called being “politically correct,” and while such correctness dangles somewhere between stifling and compassionate, there are definitely circumstances that require more attention to limiting offense more than others. The difference between Enquiry and The Duel Observer best highlights this circumstantial difference – the line between news and comedy. More ...